Headsets / Comparison

Attack Shark G500 vs HyperX Cloud Flight

Headset · Attack Shark

Attack Shark G500

Wireless · 40 mm
GEAR SCORE 82.0 / 100Very good
Connection100
Driver62
VS
Headset · HyperX

HyperX Cloud Flight

Wireless · 50 mm · 2018
GEAR SCORE 82.0 / 100Very good
Connection100
Driver84
Microphone92
Recency40
Verdict

Attack Shark G500 and HyperX Cloud Flight are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82.

  • Driver: HyperX Cloud Flight leads (50 mm vs 40 mm).
Pick this

HyperX Cloud Flight

If you care most about driver.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Attack Shark G500HyperX Cloud Flight
82Gear score82
WirelessConnectionWireless
40 mmDriver50 mm
—MicrophoneDetachable
—Release year2018

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Attack Shark G500 or HyperX Cloud Flight better?

Attack Shark G500 and HyperX Cloud Flight are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82. Driver: HyperX Cloud Flight leads (50 mm vs 40 mm).