Acer B346C bmjdphzx vs BenQ SW240
Acer B346C bmjdphzx
34″ · 2560×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSBenQ SW240
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · IPSAcer B346C bmjdphzx and BenQ SW240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 45.
- Resolution: Acer B346C bmjdphzx leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1200).
- Response time: BenQ SW240 leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Acer B346C bmjdphzx
If you care most about resolution.
BenQ SW240
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer B346C bmjdphzx | BenQ SW240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 46 | Gear score | 45 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 24.1″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1200 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 6 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $466 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer B346C bmjdphzx or BenQ SW240 better?
Acer B346C bmjdphzx and BenQ SW240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 45. Resolution: Acer B346C bmjdphzx leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1200). Response time: BenQ SW240 leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).