Acer ED270 Xbmiipx vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · IPSAcer ED270 Xbmiipx and ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Acer ED270 Xbmiipx leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).
Acer ED270 Xbmiipx
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer ED270 Xbmiipx | ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $460 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer ED270 Xbmiipx or ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q better?
Acer ED270 Xbmiipx and ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG348Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Acer ED270 Xbmiipx leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer ED270 Xbmiipx leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).