Acer EI491CR SBMIIIPHX vs Cooler Master GM27-CF
Acer EI491CR SBMIIIPHX
49″ · 3840×1080 · 120 Hz · VACooler Master GM27-CF
27″ · 1920×1080 · 165 HzAcer EI491CR SBMIIIPHX and Cooler Master GM27-CF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64.
- Resolution: Acer EI491CR SBMIIIPHX leads (3840×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Acer EI491CR SBMIIIPHX
If you care most about resolution.
Cooler Master GM27-CF
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer EI491CR SBMIIIPHX | Cooler Master GM27-CF | |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Gear score | 64 |
| 49″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | — |
| 4 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer EI491CR SBMIIIPHX or Cooler Master GM27-CF better?
Acer EI491CR SBMIIIPHX and Cooler Master GM27-CF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64. Resolution: Acer EI491CR SBMIIIPHX leads (3840×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).