Acer FT200HQLbmjj vs LG 24LQ510S-PU
Acer FT200HQLbmjj
20″ · 1600×900 · 60 HzLG 24LQ510S-PU
23.6″ · 1366×768 · 83 HzAcer FT200HQLbmjj and LG 24LQ510S-PU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 28 and 28.
- Resolution: Acer FT200HQLbmjj leads (1600×900 vs 1366×768).
- Refresh rate: LG 24LQ510S-PU leads (83 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Acer FT200HQLbmjj leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).
Acer FT200HQLbmjj
If you care most about resolution, response time.
LG 24LQ510S-PU
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer FT200HQLbmjj | LG 24LQ510S-PU | |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | Gear score | 28 |
| 20″ | Screen size | 23.6″ |
| 1600×900 | Resolution | 1366×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 83 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 14 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer FT200HQLbmjj or LG 24LQ510S-PU better?
Acer FT200HQLbmjj and LG 24LQ510S-PU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 28 and 28. Resolution: Acer FT200HQLbmjj leads (1600×900 vs 1366×768). Refresh rate: LG 24LQ510S-PU leads (83 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Acer FT200HQLbmjj leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 24LQ510S-PU leads (83 Hz vs 60 Hz).