Acer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx vs ASUS ProArt PA34VC
Acer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx
23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt PA34VC
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · IPSAcer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx and ASUS ProArt PA34VC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt PA34VC leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Acer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).
Acer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS ProArt PA34VC
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx | ASUS ProArt PA34VC | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 23.6″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx or ASUS ProArt PA34VC better?
Acer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx and ASUS ProArt PA34VC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: ASUS ProArt PA34VC leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Acer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer Nitro ED240Q Sbiipx leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).