Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X vs Sony INZONE M9 II
Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X
34″ · 3440×1440 · 240 Hz · VASony INZONE M9 II
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSAcer Nitro EDA343CUR X and Sony INZONE M9 II are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 83 and 82.
- Resolution: Sony INZONE M9 II leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X leads (240 Hz vs 160 Hz).
- Response time: Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Sony INZONE M9 II
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X | Sony INZONE M9 II | |
|---|---|---|
| 83 | Gear score | 82 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $800 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X or Sony INZONE M9 II better?
Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X and Sony INZONE M9 II are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 83 and 82. Resolution: Sony INZONE M9 II leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X leads (240 Hz vs 160 Hz). Response time: Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer Nitro EDA343CUR X leads (240 Hz vs 160 Hz).