Acer Nitro KG271U X vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
Acer Nitro KG271U X
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 138 Hz · OLEDAcer Nitro KG271U X and ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Acer Nitro KG271U X leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (0.1 ms vs 0.5 ms).
Acer Nitro KG271U X
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Nitro KG271U X | ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 84 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 47.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 138 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 0.1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Nitro KG271U X or ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ better?
Acer Nitro KG271U X and ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 84. Resolution: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Acer Nitro KG271U X leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ leads (0.1 ms vs 0.5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer Nitro KG271U X leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz).