Acer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q
Acer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · IPSASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSAcer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph and ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69.
- Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Acer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Acer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph | ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q | |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Gear score | 69 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,020 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph or ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q better?
Acer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph and ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 69 and 69. Resolution: ASUS ROG SWIFT PG349Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Acer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer Nitro XF240Y M3biiph leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).