Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx vs BenQ EX270QM
Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx
48″ · 3840×2160 · 138 Hz · OLEDBenQ EX270QM
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSAcer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx and BenQ EX270QM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 83.
- Resolution: Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: BenQ EX270QM leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz).
- Response time: Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx leads (0.01 ms vs 1 ms).
Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx
If you care most about resolution, response time.
BenQ EX270QM
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx | BenQ EX270QM | |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Gear score | 83 |
| 48″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 138 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | IPS |
| 0.01 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $400 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx or BenQ EX270QM better?
Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx and BenQ EX270QM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 84 and 83. Resolution: Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: BenQ EX270QM leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz). Response time: Acer Predator CG48 bmiiiipuzx leads (0.01 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ EX270QM leads (240 Hz vs 138 Hz).