Acer UM.BV6AA.002 vs ASUS VW22AT-CSM
Acer UM.BV6AA.002
17″ · 1280×1024 · 75 Hz · TNASUS VW22AT-CSM
22″ · 1680×1050 · 60 Hz · TNAcer UM.BV6AA.002 and ASUS VW22AT-CSM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 35.
- Resolution: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (1680×1050 vs 1280×1024).
- Refresh rate: Acer UM.BV6AA.002 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Acer UM.BV6AA.002
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS VW22AT-CSM
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer UM.BV6AA.002 | ASUS VW22AT-CSM | |
|---|---|---|
| 36 | Gear score | 35 |
| 17″ | Screen size | 22″ |
| 1280×1024 | Resolution | 1680×1050 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $144 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer UM.BV6AA.002 or ASUS VW22AT-CSM better?
Acer UM.BV6AA.002 and ASUS VW22AT-CSM are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 36 and 35. Resolution: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (1680×1050 vs 1280×1024). Refresh rate: Acer UM.BV6AA.002 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer UM.BV6AA.002 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).