Acer UM.FB6AA.003 vs AOC i2267Fw
Acer UM.FB6AA.003
24″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · IPSAOC i2267Fw
22″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAcer UM.FB6AA.003 and AOC i2267Fw are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 44.
- Resolution: Acer UM.FB6AA.003 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Response time: AOC i2267Fw leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Acer UM.FB6AA.003
If you care most about resolution.
AOC i2267Fw
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer UM.FB6AA.003 | AOC i2267Fw | |
|---|---|---|
| 44 | Gear score | 44 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 22″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 6 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer UM.FB6AA.003 or AOC i2267Fw better?
Acer UM.FB6AA.003 and AOC i2267Fw are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 44 and 44. Resolution: Acer UM.FB6AA.003 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080). Response time: AOC i2267Fw leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).