Acer UM.QB0AA.002 vs BenQ XL2411T
Acer UM.QB0AA.002
23.8″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSBenQ XL2411T
24″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNAcer UM.QB0AA.002 and BenQ XL2411T are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56.
- Resolution: Acer UM.QB0AA.002 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ XL2411T leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ XL2411T leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Acer UM.QB0AA.002
If you care most about resolution.
BenQ XL2411T
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer UM.QB0AA.002 | BenQ XL2411T | |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | Gear score | 56 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 6 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer UM.QB0AA.002 or BenQ XL2411T better?
Acer UM.QB0AA.002 and BenQ XL2411T are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56. Resolution: Acer UM.QB0AA.002 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ XL2411T leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ XL2411T leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ XL2411T leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).