Monitors / Comparison
Acer UM.VV6AA.C02 vs BenQ GW2255
Monitor · Acer
Acer UM.VV6AA.C02
23″ · 1920×1080 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Response time50
VS
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ GW2255
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Response time43
Verdict
Acer UM.VV6AA.C02 and BenQ GW2255 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 34 and 33.
- Response time: Acer UM.VV6AA.C02 leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Pick this
Acer UM.VV6AA.C02
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer UM.VV6AA.C02 | BenQ GW2255 | |
|---|---|---|
| 34 | Gear score | 33 |
| 23″ | Screen size | 21.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 6 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer UM.VV6AA.C02 or BenQ GW2255 better?
Acer UM.VV6AA.C02 and BenQ GW2255 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 34 and 33. Response time: Acer UM.VV6AA.C02 leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).