Acer XFA240 bmjdpr vs AOC AG352UCG
Acer XFA240 bmjdpr
24″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNAOC AG352UCG
35″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VAAcer XFA240 bmjdpr and AOC AG352UCG are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 61.
- Resolution: AOC AG352UCG leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Acer XFA240 bmjdpr leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).
- Response time: Acer XFA240 bmjdpr leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Acer XFA240 bmjdpr
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
AOC AG352UCG
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer XFA240 bmjdpr | AOC AG352UCG | |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Gear score | 61 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 35″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer XFA240 bmjdpr or AOC AG352UCG better?
Acer XFA240 bmjdpr and AOC AG352UCG are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 61. Resolution: AOC AG352UCG leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Acer XFA240 bmjdpr leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz). Response time: Acer XFA240 bmjdpr leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer XFA240 bmjdpr leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).