Acer XR342CK vs ASUS MG24UQ
Acer XR342CK
34″ · 3440×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSASUS MG24UQ
23.6″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSAcer XR342CK and ASUS MG24UQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
- Resolution: ASUS MG24UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Acer XR342CK leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS MG24UQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Acer XR342CK
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS MG24UQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer XR342CK | ASUS MG24UQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 23.6″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer XR342CK or ASUS MG24UQ better?
Acer XR342CK and ASUS MG24UQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58. Resolution: ASUS MG24UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Acer XR342CK leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS MG24UQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer XR342CK leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).