Monitors / Comparison

Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx vs ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS

Monitor · Acer

Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time97
VS
Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 75.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate72
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time90
Verdict

Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx and ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.

  • Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
  • Response time: Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Pick this

Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx

If you care most about response time.

Pick this

ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphxASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS
75Gear score75
31.5″Screen size31.5″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
144 HzRefresh rate180 Hz
IPSPanelVA
0.5 msResponse time1 ms
—Estimated price≈ $249

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx or ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS better?

Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx and ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG32WCS leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).