Alienware AW2725DF vs Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C
Alienware AW2725DF
26.7″ · 2560×1440 · 360 Hz · OLEDCorsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C
34″ · 3440×1440 · 240 Hz · QD-OLEDAlienware AW2725DF and Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 92 and 91.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Alienware AW2725DF leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Alienware AW2725DF
If you care most about refresh rate.
Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Alienware AW2725DF | Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C | |
|---|---|---|
| 92 | Gear score | 91 |
| 26.7″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 360 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | QD-OLED |
| — | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $900 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Alienware AW2725DF or Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C better?
Alienware AW2725DF and Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 92 and 91. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Alienware AW2725DF leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Alienware AW2725DF leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).