Alienware AW3225QF vs AOC Q27G4KD
Alienware AW3225QF
31.6″ · 3840×2160 · 240 Hz · OLEDAOC Q27G4KD
26.5″ · 2560×1440 · 500 Hz · QD-OLEDAlienware AW3225QF and AOC Q27G4KD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 94 and 94.
- Resolution: Alienware AW3225QF leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q27G4KD leads (500 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Alienware AW3225QF
If you care most about resolution.
AOC Q27G4KD
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Alienware AW3225QF | AOC Q27G4KD | |
|---|---|---|
| 94 | Gear score | 94 |
| 31.6″ | Screen size | 26.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 500 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | QD-OLED |
| — | Response time | 0.03 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Alienware AW3225QF or AOC Q27G4KD better?
Alienware AW3225QF and AOC Q27G4KD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 94 and 94. Resolution: Alienware AW3225QF leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q27G4KD leads (500 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q27G4KD leads (500 Hz vs 240 Hz).