Alienware AW3226Q vs Corsair XENEON 27QHD240
Alienware AW3226Q
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 165 Hz · WOLED · 2026Corsair XENEON 27QHD240
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · OLEDAlienware AW3226Q and Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 89.
- Resolution: Alienware AW3226Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Alienware AW3226Q
If you care most about resolution.
Corsair XENEON 27QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Alienware AW3226Q | Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 89 | Gear score | 89 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| WOLED | Panel | OLED |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| 2026 | Release year | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,080 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Alienware AW3226Q or Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 better?
Alienware AW3226Q and Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 89. Resolution: Alienware AW3226Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).