Monitors / Comparison

Alienware AW3425DW vs Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240

Monitor · Alienware

Alienware AW3425DW

34″ · 3440×1440 · 240 Hz · OLED
GEAR SCORE 90.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution88
Panel100
VS
Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240

45″ · 3440×1440 · 240 Hz · OLED
GEAR SCORE 91.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution88
Panel100
Response time100
Verdict

Alienware AW3425DW and Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 91.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Alienware AW3425DWCorsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240
90Gear score91
34″Screen size45″
3440×1440Resolution3440×1440
240 HzRefresh rate240 Hz
OLEDPanelOLED
—Response time0.03 ms
—Estimated price≈ $1,100

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Alienware AW3425DW or Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 better?

Alienware AW3425DW and Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 90 and 91.