Alienware AW3426DW vs Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500
Alienware AW3426DW
34″ · 3440×1440 · 280 Hz · QD-OLED · 2026Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500
26.5″ · 2560×1440 · 360 Hz · QD-OLEDAlienware AW3426DW and Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 93 and 93.
- Resolution: Alienware AW3426DW leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 leads (360 Hz vs 280 Hz).
Alienware AW3426DW
If you care most about resolution.
Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Alienware AW3426DW | Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 | |
|---|---|---|
| 93 | Gear score | 93 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 26.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 280 Hz | Refresh rate | 360 Hz |
| QD-OLED | Panel | QD-OLED |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| 2026 | Release year | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Alienware AW3426DW or Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 better?
Alienware AW3426DW and Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 93 and 93. Resolution: Alienware AW3426DW leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 leads (360 Hz vs 280 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips Evnia 8000 27M2N8500 leads (360 Hz vs 280 Hz).