AOC 24B2XH vs Philips 298P4QJEB/27
AOC 24B2XH
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · IPSPhilips 298P4QJEB/27
29″ · 2560×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSAOC 24B2XH and Philips 298P4QJEB/27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 46.
- Resolution: Philips 298P4QJEB/27 leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: AOC 24B2XH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 298P4QJEB/27 leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
AOC 24B2XH
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 298P4QJEB/27
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC 24B2XH | Philips 298P4QJEB/27 | |
|---|---|---|
| 46 | Gear score | 46 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 29″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 8 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC 24B2XH or Philips 298P4QJEB/27 better?
AOC 24B2XH and Philips 298P4QJEB/27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 46. Resolution: Philips 298P4QJEB/27 leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: AOC 24B2XH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 298P4QJEB/27 leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC 24B2XH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).