AOC AG352UCG vs LG 40WP95CP-W
AOC AG352UCG
35″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VALG 40WP95CP-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSAOC AG352UCG and LG 40WP95CP-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC AG352UCG leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: AOC AG352UCG leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC AG352UCG
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
LG 40WP95CP-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC AG352UCG | LG 40WP95CP-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Gear score | 60 |
| 35″ | Screen size | 39.7″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 5120×2160 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 72 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC AG352UCG or LG 40WP95CP-W better?
AOC AG352UCG and LG 40WP95CP-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60. Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: AOC AG352UCG leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: AOC AG352UCG leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC AG352UCG leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).