AOC AG352UCG vs ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD
AOC AG352UCG
35″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VAViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD
32″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VAAOC AG352UCG and ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 61.
- Resolution: AOC AG352UCG leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).
- Response time: AOC AG352UCG leads (4 ms vs 6 ms).
AOC AG352UCG
If you care most about resolution, response time.
ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC AG352UCG | ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD | |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Gear score | 61 |
| 35″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 6 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $199 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC AG352UCG or ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD better?
AOC AG352UCG and ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 61. Resolution: AOC AG352UCG leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz). Response time: AOC AG352UCG leads (4 ms vs 6 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).