AOC AG352UCG vs ViewSonic XG240R
AOC AG352UCG
35″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VAViewSonic XG240R
24″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNAOC AG352UCG and ViewSonic XG240R are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 61.
- Resolution: AOC AG352UCG leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG240R leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).
- Response time: ViewSonic XG240R leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
AOC AG352UCG
If you care most about resolution.
ViewSonic XG240R
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC AG352UCG | ViewSonic XG240R | |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Gear score | 61 |
| 35″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | TN |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC AG352UCG or ViewSonic XG240R better?
AOC AG352UCG and ViewSonic XG240R are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 61. Resolution: AOC AG352UCG leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG240R leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz). Response time: ViewSonic XG240R leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG240R leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).