AOC AG352UCG vs ViewSonic XG2702
AOC AG352UCG
35″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VAViewSonic XG2702
27″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNAOC AG352UCG and ViewSonic XG2702 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 61.
- Resolution: AOC AG352UCG leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2702 leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).
- Response time: ViewSonic XG2702 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
AOC AG352UCG
If you care most about resolution.
ViewSonic XG2702
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC AG352UCG | ViewSonic XG2702 | |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Gear score | 61 |
| 35″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | TN |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC AG352UCG or ViewSonic XG2702 better?
AOC AG352UCG and ViewSonic XG2702 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 61. Resolution: AOC AG352UCG leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2702 leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz). Response time: ViewSonic XG2702 leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic XG2702 leads (144 Hz vs 100 Hz).