AOC C32V3H vs BenQ SW240
AOC C32V3H
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VABenQ SW240
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · IPSAOC C32V3H and BenQ SW240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 45.
- Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: AOC C32V3H leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: AOC C32V3H leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC C32V3H
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
BenQ SW240
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC C32V3H | BenQ SW240 | |
|---|---|---|
| 46 | Gear score | 45 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24.1″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1200 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $466 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC C32V3H or BenQ SW240 better?
AOC C32V3H and BenQ SW240 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 45. Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: AOC C32V3H leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: AOC C32V3H leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC C32V3H leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).