AOC CQ27G4ZH vs MSI MAG 274URFW
AOC CQ27G4ZH
27″ · 2560×1440 · 300 Hz · VAMSI MAG 274URFW
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSAOC CQ27G4ZH and MSI MAG 274URFW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82.
- Resolution: MSI MAG 274URFW leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC CQ27G4ZH leads (300 Hz vs 160 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 274URFW leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
AOC CQ27G4ZH
If you care most about refresh rate.
MSI MAG 274URFW
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC CQ27G4ZH | MSI MAG 274URFW | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Gear score | 82 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 300 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $350 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC CQ27G4ZH or MSI MAG 274URFW better?
AOC CQ27G4ZH and MSI MAG 274URFW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82. Resolution: MSI MAG 274URFW leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC CQ27G4ZH leads (300 Hz vs 160 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 274URFW leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC CQ27G4ZH leads (300 Hz vs 160 Hz).