AOC CQ32G4VE vs MSI Optix MAG301RF
AOC CQ32G4VE
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · Fast VAMSI Optix MAG301RF
29.5″ · 2560×1080 · 200 Hz · IPSAOC CQ32G4VE and MSI Optix MAG301RF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 75.
- Resolution: AOC CQ32G4VE leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI Optix MAG301RF leads (200 Hz vs 180 Hz).
- Response time: AOC CQ32G4VE leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
AOC CQ32G4VE
If you care most about resolution, response time.
MSI Optix MAG301RF
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC CQ32G4VE | MSI Optix MAG301RF | |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Gear score | 75 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 29.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| Fast VA | Panel | IPS |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $325 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC CQ32G4VE or MSI Optix MAG301RF better?
AOC CQ32G4VE and MSI Optix MAG301RF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 76 and 75. Resolution: AOC CQ32G4VE leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: MSI Optix MAG301RF leads (200 Hz vs 180 Hz). Response time: AOC CQ32G4VE leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI Optix MAG301RF leads (200 Hz vs 180 Hz).