Monitors / Comparison
AOC CU32V3 vs LG 38BN75C-B
Monitor · AOC
AOC CU32V3
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAGood
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · LG
LG 38BN75C-B
38″ · 3840×1600 · 60 Hz · IPSGood
Refresh rate15
Resolution92
Panel80
Response time50
Verdict
AOC CU32V3 and LG 38BN75C-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Resolution: AOC CU32V3 leads (3840×2160 vs 3840×1600).
- Response time: AOC CU32V3 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
AOC CU32V3
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC CU32V3 | LG 38BN75C-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 38″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3840×1600 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC CU32V3 or LG 38BN75C-B better?
AOC CU32V3 and LG 38BN75C-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Resolution: AOC CU32V3 leads (3840×2160 vs 3840×1600). Response time: AOC CU32V3 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).