Monitors / Comparison
AOC CU32V3 vs LG 43UN700T-B
Monitor · AOC
AOC CU32V3
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAGood
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · LG
LG 43UN700T-B
43″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSGood
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time30
Verdict
AOC CU32V3 and LG 43UN700T-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Response time: AOC CU32V3 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this
AOC CU32V3
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC CU32V3 | LG 43UN700T-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 43″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC CU32V3 or LG 43UN700T-B better?
AOC CU32V3 and LG 43UN700T-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Response time: AOC CU32V3 leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).