AOC e1621Sw vs LG E1942S-BN
LG E1942S-BN
18.5″ · 1360×768 · 60 HzOn specs, LG E1942S-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for AOC e1621Sw.
- Resolution: AOC e1621Sw leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768).
- Response time: LG E1942S-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
AOC e1621Sw
If you care most about resolution.
LG E1942S-BN
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC e1621Sw | LG E1942S-BN | |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Gear score | 24 |
| 16″ | Screen size | 18.5″ |
| 1366×768 | Resolution | 1360×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 8 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC e1621Sw or LG E1942S-BN better?
On specs, LG E1942S-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for AOC e1621Sw. Resolution: AOC e1621Sw leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768). Response time: LG E1942S-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).