Monitors / Comparison
AOC e1621Sw vs LG E1942TC-BN
VS
Monitor · LG
LG E1942TC-BN
18.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time50
Verdict
On specs, LG E1942TC-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for AOC e1621Sw.
- Response time: LG E1942TC-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this
LG E1942TC-BN
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC e1621Sw | LG E1942TC-BN | |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Gear score | 24 |
| 16″ | Screen size | 18.5″ |
| 1366×768 | Resolution | 1366×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 8 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC e1621Sw or LG E1942TC-BN better?
On specs, LG E1942TC-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for AOC e1621Sw. Response time: LG E1942TC-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).