Monitors / Comparison
AOC E943FWSK vs LG E1942S-BN
Monitor · AOC
AOC E943FWSK
18.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time50
VS
Monitor · LG
LG E1942S-BN
18.5″ · 1360×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time50
Verdict
AOC E943FWSK and LG E1942S-BN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 24 and 24.
- Resolution: AOC E943FWSK leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768).
Pick this
AOC E943FWSK
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC E943FWSK | LG E1942S-BN | |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Gear score | 24 |
| 18.5″ | Screen size | 18.5″ |
| 1366×768 | Resolution | 1360×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC E943FWSK or LG E1942S-BN better?
AOC E943FWSK and LG E1942S-BN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 24 and 24. Resolution: AOC E943FWSK leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768).