Monitors / Comparison
AOC E960SRDA vs CTL MTLP2000
Monitor · AOC
AOC E960SRDA
19″ · 1280×1024 · 60 Hz · TNEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution33
Panel50
Response time50
VS
Monitor · CTL
CTL MTLP2000
20″ · 1600×900 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution36
Response time78
Verdict
AOC E960SRDA and CTL MTLP2000 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 32 and 32.
- Resolution: CTL MTLP2000 leads (1600×900 vs 1280×1024).
- Response time: CTL MTLP2000 leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
CTL MTLP2000
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC E960SRDA | CTL MTLP2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | Gear score | 32 |
| 19″ | Screen size | 20″ |
| 1280×1024 | Resolution | 1600×900 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC E960SRDA or CTL MTLP2000 better?
AOC E960SRDA and CTL MTLP2000 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 32 and 32. Resolution: CTL MTLP2000 leads (1600×900 vs 1280×1024). Response time: CTL MTLP2000 leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).