AOC Q27V3 vs Samsung UH850
AOC Q27V3
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSSamsung UH850
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAAOC Q27V3 and Samsung UH850 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Resolution: Samsung UH850 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q27V3 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung UH850 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q27V3
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung UH850
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q27V3 | Samsung UH850 | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $200 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q27V3 or Samsung UH850 better?
AOC Q27V3 and Samsung UH850 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Resolution: Samsung UH850 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q27V3 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung UH850 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q27V3 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).