AOC Q3279VWFD8 vs BenQ XL2411T
AOC Q3279VWFD8
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ XL2411T
24″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNAOC Q3279VWFD8 and BenQ XL2411T are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56.
- Resolution: AOC Q3279VWFD8 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ XL2411T leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).
- Response time: AOC Q3279VWFD8 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWFD8
If you care most about resolution, response time.
BenQ XL2411T
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWFD8 | BenQ XL2411T | |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | Gear score | 56 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWFD8 or BenQ XL2411T better?
AOC Q3279VWFD8 and BenQ XL2411T are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56. Resolution: AOC Q3279VWFD8 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ XL2411T leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz). Response time: AOC Q3279VWFD8 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ XL2411T leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).