AOC U2477PWQ vs ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV
AOC U2477PWQ
23.6″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · PLSASUS ProArt Display PA278CV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSAOC U2477PWQ and ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Resolution: AOC U2477PWQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: AOC U2477PWQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC U2477PWQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC U2477PWQ | ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 23.6″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| PLS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $272 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC U2477PWQ or ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV better?
AOC U2477PWQ and ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Resolution: AOC U2477PWQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: AOC U2477PWQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).