AOC U3277FWQ vs ASUS PB278QV
AOC U3277FWQ
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAASUS PB278QV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSAOC U3277FWQ and ASUS PB278QV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Resolution: AOC U3277FWQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS PB278QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: AOC U3277FWQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC U3277FWQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
ASUS PB278QV
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC U3277FWQ | ASUS PB278QV | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC U3277FWQ or ASUS PB278QV better?
AOC U3277FWQ and ASUS PB278QV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Resolution: AOC U3277FWQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS PB278QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: AOC U3277FWQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS PB278QV leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).