AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01 vs LG 40WP95C-W
AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01
23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · VALG 40WP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSAOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01 and LG 40WP95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01 leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).
AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 40WP95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01 | LG 40WP95C-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Gear score | 60 |
| 23.6″ | Screen size | 39.7″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 5120×2160 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 72 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $108 | Estimated price | ≈ $1,400 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01 or LG 40WP95C-W better?
AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01 and LG 40WP95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60. Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01 leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01 leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: AOPEN UM.UW1AA.P01 ≈ $108, LG 40WP95C-W ≈ $1,400. Current prices vary by store.