ASRock Challenger CL27FFA vs LG 38CB99-W
ASRock Challenger CL27FFA
27″ · 1920×1080 · 120 Hz · IPSLG 38CB99-W
38″ · 3840×1600 · 75 Hz · IPSASRock Challenger CL27FFA and LG 38CB99-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59.
- Resolution: LG 38CB99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASRock Challenger CL27FFA leads (120 Hz vs 75 Hz).
ASRock Challenger CL27FFA
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 38CB99-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock Challenger CL27FFA | LG 38CB99-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 59 | Gear score | 59 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 38″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×1600 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $110 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock Challenger CL27FFA or LG 38CB99-W better?
ASRock Challenger CL27FFA and LG 38CB99-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59. Resolution: LG 38CB99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASRock Challenger CL27FFA leads (120 Hz vs 75 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASRock Challenger CL27FFA leads (120 Hz vs 75 Hz).