ASRock CL25FF vs ASUS MG28UQ
ASRock CL25FF
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · IPSASUS MG28UQ
28″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · TNASRock CL25FF and ASUS MG28UQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Resolution: ASUS MG28UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASRock CL25FF leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS MG28UQ leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASRock CL25FF
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS MG28UQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock CL25FF | ASUS MG28UQ | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 28″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock CL25FF or ASUS MG28UQ better?
ASRock CL25FF and ASUS MG28UQ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Resolution: ASUS MG28UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASRock CL25FF leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS MG28UQ leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASRock CL25FF leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).