ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A vs BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ
ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A
27″ · 1920×1080 · 520 Hz · IPSBenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ
48″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · OLEDASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A and BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 81.
- Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A leads (520 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A
If you care most about refresh rate.
BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A | BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Gear score | 81 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 48″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 520 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.1 ms |
| ≈ $300 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A or BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ better?
ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A and BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 81. Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A leads (520 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX480UZ leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A leads (520 Hz vs 120 Hz).