ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A vs MSI MAG 323UPF
ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A
27″ · 1920×1080 · 520 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 323UPF
32″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A and MSI MAG 323UPF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82.
- Resolution: MSI MAG 323UPF leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A leads (520 Hz vs 160 Hz).
ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A
If you care most about refresh rate.
MSI MAG 323UPF
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A | MSI MAG 323UPF | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Gear score | 82 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 520 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $300 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A or MSI MAG 323UPF better?
ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A and MSI MAG 323UPF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 82. Resolution: MSI MAG 323UPF leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A leads (520 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASRock Phantom Gaming PG27FFX2A leads (520 Hz vs 160 Hz).