ASUS CG32UQ vs iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1
ASUS CG32UQ
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAiiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1
27″ · 2560×1440 · 70 Hz · IPSASUS CG32UQ and iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Resolution: ASUS CG32UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1 leads (70 Hz vs 60 Hz).
ASUS CG32UQ
If you care most about resolution.
iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS CG32UQ | iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 70 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS CG32UQ or iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1 better?
ASUS CG32UQ and iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Resolution: ASUS CG32UQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1 leads (70 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: iiyama ProLite XUB2792QSU-W1 leads (70 Hz vs 60 Hz).