ASUS MG279Q vs ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
ASUS MG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSASUS MG279Q and ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS MG279Q leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS MG279Q leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS MG279Q
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MG279Q | ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $2,700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MG279Q or ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K better?
ASUS MG279Q and ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS MG279Q leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS MG279Q leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS MG279Q leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).