ASUS ML248H vs V7 LED215W2R-8N
ASUS ML248H
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TN · 2010V7 LED215W2R-8N
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 75 HzASUS ML248H and V7 LED215W2R-8N are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39.
- Refresh rate: V7 LED215W2R-8N leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ML248H leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ML248H
If you care most about response time.
V7 LED215W2R-8N
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ML248H | V7 LED215W2R-8N | |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | Gear score | 39 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 21.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| TN | Panel | — |
| 2 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| 2010 | Release year | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ML248H or V7 LED215W2R-8N better?
ASUS ML248H and V7 LED215W2R-8N are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 39 and 39. Refresh rate: V7 LED215W2R-8N leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ML248H leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: V7 LED215W2R-8N leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).