Monitors / Comparison
ASUS MX25AQ vs Eizo CG277-BK
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS MX25AQ
25″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Eizo
Eizo CG277-BK
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time43
Verdict
ASUS MX25AQ and Eizo CG277-BK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51.
- Response time: ASUS MX25AQ leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Pick this
ASUS MX25AQ
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MX25AQ | Eizo CG277-BK | |
|---|---|---|
| 51 | Gear score | 51 |
| 25″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 6 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MX25AQ or Eizo CG277-BK better?
ASUS MX25AQ and Eizo CG277-BK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51. Response time: ASUS MX25AQ leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).