Monitors / Comparison
ASUS MX279H vs Samsung CF396
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS MX279H
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPS · 2012Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time50
Recency20
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung CF396
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict
ASUS MX279H and Samsung CF396 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 42.
- Response time: Samsung CF396 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
Samsung CF396
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MX279H | Samsung CF396 | |
|---|---|---|
| 42 | Gear score | 42 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| 2012 | Release year | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $100 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MX279H or Samsung CF396 better?
ASUS MX279H and Samsung CF396 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 42. Response time: Samsung CF396 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).